Technofyed

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bugatti_Veyron Wrote:The Veyron features an 8.0 litre W16 engine — 16 cylinders in two banks of eight cylinders, or the equivalent of two narrow-angle V8 engines mated in a "W" configuration. Each cylinder has four valves for a total of 64, but the narrow staggered 8 configuration allows two overhead camshafts to drive two banks of cylinders so only four camshafts are needed. The engine is fed by four turbochargers and displaces 7,993 cubic centimetres (487.8 cu in), with a square 86 mm by 86 mm (3.4 in × 3.4 in) bore and stroke.

The Bugatti Veyron has a total of 10 radiators.[13]

* 4 radiators for the engine cooling system.
* 1 heat exchanger for the air-to-liquid intercoolers.
* 2 for the air conditioning system.
* 1 transmission oil radiator.
* 1 differential oil radiator.
* 1 engine oil radiator.

According to Volkswagen Group, the DIN rated motive power output, approved by TÜV Süddeutschland, of the final production Veyron engine produces 736 kilowatts (1,001 PS; 987 bhp), and generates 1,250 newton metres (922 ft·lbf) of torque.[16] The figure has been confirmed by Bugatti officials to actually be conservative, with the real total being 1020 bhp or more.

The top speed was verified by James May on Top Gear for the November 2006 issue, again at Volkswagen Group's private Ehra-Lessien test track, where the final-production car hit 407.9 km/h (253.5 mph), which equated to almost one-third of the speed of sound at sea level. As the Bugatti Veyron approached the top speed during the test, May said that "the tyres will only last for about fifteen minutes, but it's okay because the fuel runs out in twelve minutes". He also gave an indication of the power requirements, at a constant 155 mph, the Veyron is using approximately 270 of its 1001 horsepower. The next 100 mph requires 730 additional horsepower.

The Veyron consumes more fuel than nearly any larger car (not including buses or heavy trucks), using 40.4 litres per 100 kilometres (6.99 mpg-imp; 5.82 mpg-US) in city driving and 24.1 litres per 100 kilometres (11.7 mpg-imp; 9.76 mpg-US) in combined cycle.[citation needed] At full throttle, it uses more than 115 litres per 100 kilometres (2.46 mpg-imp; 2.05 mpg-US), which would empty its 100 litres (22.0 imp gal; 26.4 US gal) fuel tank in just 12 minutes.

Gordon Murray, designer of the McLaren F1 (which for many years was the fastest production car ever built) said the following about the Bugatti Veyron in UK auto magazine evo during its development period:

“ The most pointless exercise on the planet has got to be this four-wheel-drive 1,000 horsepower (750 kW) Bugatti. I think it's incredibly childish this thing people have about just one element—top speed, standing kilometre or 0–60. It's about as narrow minded as you can get as a car designer to pick on one element. It's like saying we're going to beat the original Mini because we're going to make a car 10 mph (16 km/h) faster on its top speed—but it's two feet longer and 200 kilos heavier. That's not car designing—that just reeks of a company who are paranoid..."

The Bugatti Veyron was the fastest (top speed) street production vehicle 2005-2007. It can go 0-100MPH in around 2.5 seconds... It's engine is basically two twin-turbo v8's combined...

I like this one better. I really like that red.

I've never liked the looks of the front of a Bugatti. The rear isn't too much better, but I do really like the interior.

Looks aside, I would have way too much fun with that car.

(01-07-2010 06:23 AM)GT4AWD Wrote: [ -> ]

Thats what I'm talking about.

(01-07-2010 08:28 PM)RWenger Wrote: [ -> ]Looks aside, I would have way too much fun with that car.

Thats the point.

The red one does not look that bad, but the solid ones look like they're about to go around a curve and swallow a small animal sitting in the middle of the road.

A Bugatti Veyron Pur Sang

Thats a badass looking car.

Fixed that picture.

I think my Veyron would be solid gloss black!

Lol so we are back to this. I still like the dark red & black best because I'm a fan of dark red (although the silver looks cool).

I wish that I could afford one.

I agree with you townsbg. I like that one too.

That silver one looks too high maintenance. I'd have the compulsion to shine it all the time.